writers and such
Sunday steps: 6648
Monday steps: 8909
Tuesday steps: 9349
Wednesday steps: 8059
Writers Group tonight - so hubby and I met at Subway for a "quiet" dinner. Ha! Family came in with 7 kids, mom and grandma. Boys were normal (aka rowdy and noisy). Nah, it didn't bother us really. If we had wanted a quiet dinner it would not have been at Subway - we were looking for quick, without it being fast food, you see. I went off to my meeting, hubby went home for a few minutes and then to his meeting of ABATE (Alaska Bikers Advocating Training and Education), where they were planning their Thanksgiving basket food-raiser.
We had a smallish group at WG, only 9 tonight, but that meant that everyone who wanted to, was able to read. We only meet twice a month and I am honored to sit among some very good writers there.
Came home to the treadmill and then ER and now here.
Have any of you been following some of the NANOWRIMO writers? Oh, my, now that is dedication. I was reading some of the comments from the Alaskans involved (on the forum) and nearly ALL of the AK participants are high schoolers! Daughter tells me that some are home schooled and their parents are using NANO as their English studies for November. I would just wonder when they would have time to do the rest of their homework.
We touched on schools and teaching tonight at WG. One of the men had a bumper sticker on his satchel - about one of his kids being on the honor roll. He said that all of them had been, but that they still were normal kids - ie the kind who get into scrapes.
This all brought up a discussion on when my youngest was in junior high school (they call it a middle school now and include 6th graders in the building). The bumper sticker sent home for honor roll students read MY KID IS A HONOR ROLL STUDENT. Hmmm, whatever is wrong with that statement.
Everyone out there who attended catholic schools raise your hand nicely to be called upon, please. Suzie? Yes, you are correct. The proper sentence should read MY KID IS AN HONOR ROLL STUDENT. One of the ladies (a retired teacher) said that according to the English something or other that the first sentence is also correct. But, oh my, oh my . . . I would not be able to use it that way - the nuns must be rolling in their graves over it, you know?
Then, of course, we went on to other pet mistakes . . . the use of that and the non-use of who for humans, and vice versa for inanimate objects. Oh, dear . . . the local newspaper strikes again. The woman that said such and so . . . ARGH! Of course, the woman is a human being and the sentence should read: The woman who said such and so.
Little stuff, but peevish stuff.
back to the keyboard. I know that I must frustrate some because I don't always capitalize, and unless it is a formal letter (for work, for instance) then I generally do not capitalize my first name.
Sorry, I must go now . . . I sense a nun coming up behind me with a metal edged ruler and my knuckles don't want that . . . see you.
Posted by Purplemoose at November 6, 2003 10:46 PM